Explore how specialized AI agents perceive, plan, and act. Discover why "smaller and specialized" is often better than "bigger and general."
General LLMs are powerful, but often too expensive or unreliable for specific agentic loops. Fine-tuning bridges the gap.
Fine-tuning smaller models (1-7B params) for specific tasks like tool calling reduces cost and latency compared to using giant models like GPT-4 for everything.
Specialized models are less likely to "hallucinate" formats. They can be trained to strictly output JSON or SQL, ensuring smooth system integration.
Instead of one monolith, agents use a "team" of models: a Planner, a Coder, and a Validator, each fine-tuned for its specific role.
Click on the components below to see how a fine-tuned agentic system processes a user request.
Classifies Intent
Decomposes Task
Calls APIs / Actions
Click on the flowchart nodes to learn about their specific roles in an agentic system.
The Router Model is often a small, efficient classifier. It doesn't solve the problem; it simply looks at the user's request and decides which specialist agent or toolset is needed.
The Planner Model is fine-tuned to generate high-level plans or "Chain-of-Thought" reasoning. It breaks a complex goal (e.g., "Plan a travel itinerary") into sub-steps (1. Search flights, 2. Book hotel, 3. Find restaurants).
The Executor Model is fine-tuned strictly for syntax and API usage. It takes a sub-step from the planner and translates it into a precise computer command (e.g., JSON, SQL, or Python code).
Key Benefit: Fine-tuning here drastically reduces syntax errors compared to general models, ensuring reliable tool interaction.
(Click to reveal)
A technique to fine-tune models efficiently by freezing most weights and only training small rank-decomposition matrices. Allows training on consumer hardware.
(Click to reveal)
Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on sequences of expert observations and actions so the model learns to mimic expert decisions.
(Click to reveal)
Using reinforcement learning with a reward model trained on human preferences to align the agent, reducing toxicity and increasing helpfulness.
(Click to reveal)
The challenge where an agent trained in a digital simulation fails when deployed on physical robots due to real-world noise and physics differences.
Collecting "expert traces" (e.g., from GPT-4) and training a smaller model to copy the reasoning steps. This effectively distills high intelligence into a faster model.
Training on pairs of user queries and JSON function calls. Example: Converting "What's the weather in Tokyo?" into { "function": "get_weather", "args": "Tokyo" }.
Robotics agents like RoboCat use self-generated data. They try a task, succeed, add that success to their training set, and re-train themselves.
1. What is the primary benefit of using "LoRA" for agentic fine-tuning?
2. In a multi-model architecture, what is the role of the "Router"?
3. What does "SFT" stand for in the context of training agents?